User:ConstanceWarner498 reinle

The publisher's justification for a brand new "edition" is that [www.MyParallelBible.com Chant D'Esperance] was first revealed in 1909 added material and published another edition in 1917. however it is an author's preogative to alter his own works, however that definitely doesn't provide others, more than forty five years when his death, a blank check to make alterations and then sign his name to it!

If we have a tendency to altered the ending of "Macbeth" we might be less than honest to claim that the change met Shakespeare's approval.

Secondly, the editors exercised great liberty in changing attributes of Dr. Scofield's reference work that Dr. Scofield himself felt vital enough to incorporate in his work. in the introduction to their doubly dishonest 1967 publication they admit such changes.

New Scofield: "Among the changes and improvements in this edition are: necessary word changes within the text to help the reader; a modified system of self-pronunciation; revision of the many of the introductions to the books of the Bible, as well as designation of the author, theme, and date; a lot of subheadings; clarification of some footnotes, deletion of others, and also the addition of many new notes;: additional marginal references; a wholly new chronology; a new index; a concordance particularly prepared for this edition; new maps; and additional legible sort. a number of these features are explained below."

By their own words, they admit to altering Dr. Scofield's text (the King James Bible), introduction of books of the Bible, notes, marginal references, chronology and plenty of alternative options.

[www.MyParallelBible.com Spanish English bilingual bible] provide his approval to those changes? Not unless one of the nine committee members had the witch of Endor conjure him up as she had Samuel!

In fact, the publisher even admits that the changes created were arbitrary decisions of the revision committee.

"Each position taken represents the thinking or conviction of the committee as a gaggle."

What are the results of such shenanigans? One example will suffice. allow us to examine the footnote found in Acts 8:12 of the [www.MyParallelBible.com Haitian Creole Bible] concerning baptism.

"Baptism has, since the apostolic age, been practiced by every major cluster in the Christian church and, in Protestant communions, is recognized joined of 2 sacraments - the other being the Lord's Supper. Since early in the Church's history 3 different modes of baptism have been used: aspersion (sprinkling); affusion (pouring); and immersion (dipping)."

Here we tend to see that the nine revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) believe that there's a difference between the true Christian church and Protestant "communion". may I ask? When one group is outlined as "Protestant" what's the opposite group called?

Secondly, the nine apostate revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) claim, without scriptural proof that Christians baptize by pouring and sprinkling in addition as immersion.

Remember, the footnote is found during a S-C-O-F-I-E-L-D of 1967. A book that claims on its title page that a dead man (Dr. Scofield) is one of its editors.

What does the footnote for Acts 8:12 within the REAL [www.MyParallelBible.com Scofield bible] of 1917 which had a living Dr. Scofield as its editor say?

Nothing. there is no such footnote!

That's right! The New Haitian Creole Bible never approved of and never had during a text anytime in his life time!

I ask you, is that this honest?

Proof that the large print [www.MyParallelBible.com french english Parallel bible] is found on virtually each page where the margin notes the twin Bible reading as "KJV". The text of the New Scofield Bible is not a King James Bible and it is NOT a Scofield Bible.

It might be noted that in recent years the scale and shape of the New Scofield Bible has been changed to additional resemble the Scofield Reference Bible. several Christians who want a real Scofield Reference Bible have purchased a replacement Scofield Bible by mistake.