User:RolenHassell320 reinle

The publisher's justification for a brand new "edition" is that [www.MyParallelBible.com Chant D'Esperance] was 1st published in 1909 added material and revealed another edition in 1917. but it's an author's preogative to alter his own works, however that certainly does not provide others, more than forty five years when his death, a blank check to create alterations and then sign his name to it!

If we tend to altered the ending of "Macbeth" we would be less than honest to assert that the change met Shakespeare's approval.

Secondly, the editors exercised great liberty in changing attributes of Dr. Scofield's reference work that Dr. Scofield himself felt necessary enough to include in his work. within the introduction to their doubly dishonest 1967 publication they admit such changes.

New Scofield: "Among the changes and improvements during this edition are: important word changes within the text to help the reader; a modified system of self-pronunciation; revision of the many of the introductions to the books of the Bible, as well as designation of the author, theme, and date; a lot of subheadings; clarification of some footnotes, deletion of others, and also the addition of many new notes;: additional marginal references; a wholly new chronology; a replacement index; a concordance particularly ready for this edition; new maps; and additional legible type. some of these options are explained below."

By their own words, they admit to altering Dr. Scofield's text (the King James Bible), introduction of books of the Bible, notes, marginal references, chronology and plenty of different features.

[www.MyParallelBible.com Spanish English bilingual bible] offer his approval to those changes? Not unless one in every of the nine committee members had the witch of Endor conjure him up as she had Samuel!

In fact, the publisher even admits that the changes created were arbitrary choices of the revision committee.

"Each position taken represents the thinking or conviction of the committee as a group."

What are the results of such shenanigans? One example will suffice. allow us to examine the footnote found in Acts 8:12 of the [www.MyParallelBible.com Haitian Creole Bible] concerning baptism.

"Baptism has, since the apostolic age, been practiced by every major group within the Christian church and, in Protestant communions, is recognized mutually of two sacraments - the other being the Lord's Supper. Since early within the Church's history three different modes of baptism have been used: aspersion (sprinkling); affusion (pouring); and immersion (dipping)."

Here we tend to see that the nine revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) believe that there's a distinction between the true Christian church and Protestant "communion". would possibly I ask? When one group is defined as "Protestant" what's the other group called?

Secondly, the 9 apostate revisors (NOT Dr. Scofield) claim, while not scriptural proof that Christians baptize by pouring and sprinkling similarly as immersion.

Remember, the footnote is found during a S-C-O-F-I-E-L-D of 1967. A book that claims on its title page that a dead man (Dr. Scofield) is one among its editors.

What will the footnote for Acts 8:12 within the REAL [www.MyParallelBible.com Scofield bible] of 1917 which had a living Dr. Scofield as its editor say?

Nothing. there's no such footnote!

That's right! The New Haitian Creole Bible never approved of and never had in a very text anytime in his life time!

I ask you, is that this honest?

Proof that the big print [www.MyParallelBible.com french english Parallel bible] is found on almost each page where the margin notes the twin Bible reading as "KJV". The text of the New Scofield Bible isn't a King James Bible and it is NOT a Scofield Bible.

It might be noted that in recent years the scale and form of the New Scofield Bible has been changed to more resemble the Scofield Reference Bible. several Christians who want a true Scofield Reference Bible have purchased a replacement Scofield Bible by mistake.